Tuesday, 20 April 2010

10-BAR Cosmos




A Combination of Disparate Elements
Resulting in a Fortunate Outcome

The process of combining elements to enable structures from various, often random components has a history which can be tracked both in art/historical terms right through every aspect of human endeavour to a molecular level. This work began with an investigation into the structure of components, particularly carbon-based compounds. The elemental building block of all life on earth because of its ability to bond, almost carelessly, with other elements.

In terms of process, early steel manufacture for instance, involved a technique in which the raw materials employed were dung, earth, urine and wood ashes - all burnt to a crisp in a pot. The result was swords that won wars and seating that didn’t bend so often. This process was likely to have been discovered by happy accident - like so many technological advances made in chemistry, alchemy (chemistry with cloaks), science and home economics.

This throne entitled 10-BAR Cosmos represents a slow-moving cumbersome construction. A super large-scale random chemical bond which ultimately results in the form of a chair, albeit with some imperfections and unwanted parts which ultimately make it unusable as a chair.

Such imperfect combinations often result in something which contains an aesthetic value above it’s practical worth. Conversely various combinations of carbon – coal for instance, with its resident impurities, is undoubtedly more ‘useful’ than diamond - an almost pure form of carbon. The comparison is ambiguous and relative. To a person in the dead of winter a piece of coal may be far more beautiful than an enchanting but ultimately useless diamond. Diamonds on the other hand are more valuable to those who rarely handle coal.

Marcus FitzGibbon
Project 204:2010
www.2042010.com

Friday, 29 January 2010

Never let the truth get in the way of a good story

Re publicity for the forthcoming exhibition on Friday morning these are the comments so far:


EJ Nutbrown
I vote the first image of both back and front.
I think you've done a fab job. Only thing I'd point out it is the use of the word disco...? Sounds a little bit school days.
Thank you!!
Sent from my iPhone

Matthew Douglas
I like postcard back 2 and front 2 and prefer the name 2 and 8 [ even though I missed the meeting and don't understand the significance ]
Id stick to those designs since time is of the essence
magic !
cant wait to set it all up 
regards
matthew

Shelley Davis
Hi Marcus and everyone,
Thanks for that. I think they're great! I like the 'drawing' one best.
Perhaps have a map on the back as the venue is a little bit hidden. I'm not sure the name needs to be on the front as well as the back. Better on the back I think and maybe take out 'an' sounds more definite then.
I'll have another think about the name of the group... got someone else (Joyce recommended them) working on it too. I'll let you know if we come up with anything.
We thought we'd have another meeting at GWRSA on Tuesday 9th at 6pm just to clarify things before the show on Thursday 11th Feb!
See you there,
Shelley

PS I have some photos that Tom took. I'll upload them for you Marcus before Sat.
Bernard Fairhust
Not just RSA but GWRSA
sorry to miss the meeting today, some poor person died on the M5 and all points south were blocked.
if someone would like to use that nice curved alcove by where Matt is doing something that would be Ok with me and if I ever produce something it could fit in on some floor-space.
Seems like a good idea to use the graffito card design, I think the text works and too little time to worry about design details.
best wishes
Bernard

Tom Martin
I missed the 'front' pages first time, the graffiti one looks great and the font. I wonder if the title would stand out better in red or dense black?
Should it be 'an exhibition of recent art work by.....?' It looks like an invite to a 'bar and disco'... I might be the only one to think that.
Tom